Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
Regarding the London bombings: with the general assumption of al-Qaeda links
and TV commentators expressing surprise that two of the bombs were let off in areas with a high Muslim population, it seems to me that the explosions were designed to cause as much long-term disruption to the tube network as possible, rather than targeting (or avoiding) specific types of people: - Edgware Road caused the loss of three lines (or parts of): District (Edgware Rd branch), Circle, Hammersmith & City. - Aldgate similarly caused the closure of three lines: Circle, Hammersmith & City, Metropolitan. - Kings X was located at the Picc Line reversing point, thus causing two sections to be closed: Arnos Grove to Kings X, and Kings X to Hyde Park Corner. Had the bomb detonated a couple of stations either side of Kings X, it would have presumably been possible to keep one of the two sections running. This would certainly mean precision timing and therefore significant prior research, suggesting that the perpetrators were home grown. Where the bus explosion comes into all this is open to question. Maybe the bomb was indeed meant for another tube line but didn't find its target for whatever reason(s). If so, one can only begin to guess where it might have been intended for. Another location radiating from Kings X? Perhaps this is giving those responsible for the carnage too much credence and the only reason those locations were chosen is that they proved to be the easiest routes on which to leave an item unattended without detection or suspicion. - - - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
subterraneo wrote:
Regarding the London bombings: with the general assumption of al-Qaeda links and TV commentators expressing surprise that two of the bombs were let off in areas with a high Muslim population, it seems to me that the explosions were designed to cause as much long-term disruption to the tube network as possible, rather than targeting (or avoiding) specific types of people: - Edgware Road caused the loss of three lines (or parts of): District (Edgware Rd branch), Circle, Hammersmith & City. - Aldgate similarly caused the closure of three lines: Circle, Hammersmith & City, Metropolitan. - Kings X was located at the Picc Line reversing point, thus causing two sections to be closed: Arnos Grove to Kings X, and Kings X to Hyde Park Corner. Had the bomb detonated a couple of stations either side of Kings X, it would have presumably been possible to keep one of the two sections running. I noticed this too. They hit as hard as they could have done -- especially with the Picc bomb, which would have closed far less if it were literally anywhere else. They managed to hit the precise point they needed, and I think it was deliberate. This would certainly mean precision timing and therefore significant prior research, suggesting that the perpetrators were home grown. Where the bus explosion comes into all this is open to question. Maybe the bomb was indeed meant for another tube line but didn't find its target for whatever reason(s). If so, one can only begin to guess where it might have been intended for. Another location radiating from Kings X? The obvious choice would be the junctions immediately south of Camden Town, but that's hard to hit with precision unless you're a suicide bomber. More likely this was a deliberate move to hit evacuees and responders -- the IRA has done this in the past. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
I'd put the following locations high on the disruption list
* Oxford Circus (Vicc and Bakerloo cross platform, central interchange) * Camden Town (as you mention, stops all northern line trans) * Mile End (Stops All Central line and District from the east) * Earls Court (All district from the west, all wimbledon services, although piccadilly would still work) * Baker Street/Circle junction (Stops circle/h&c Edgware Road - Moorgate or similar, maybe met line too. ERoad doesn't have that much turnarround ability either.) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
In article .com,
Alistair Bell writes I noticed this too. They hit as hard as they could have done -- Not so. An explosion approaching Baker Street would have been better than one just west of Edgware Road. It also looks as if train 204 was being held for a conflicting move, so the bomb should have gone off at Aldgate with far less resulting disruption. Anyway, why hit the same line twice? The obvious choice would be the junctions immediately south of Camden Town, but that's hard to hit with precision unless you're a suicide bomber. Agreed. But how about Oxford Circus, closing both Victoria and Bakerloo Lines in one hit? -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
And Central line
Loony T "Clive D. W. Feather" wrote in message ... In article .com, Alistair Bell writes I noticed this too. They hit as hard as they could have done -- Not so. An explosion approaching Baker Street would have been better than one just west of Edgware Road. It also looks as if train 204 was being held for a conflicting move, so the bomb should have gone off at Aldgate with far less resulting disruption. Anyway, why hit the same line twice? The obvious choice would be the junctions immediately south of Camden Town, but that's hard to hit with precision unless you're a suicide bomber. Agreed. But how about Oxford Circus, closing both Victoria and Bakerloo Lines in one hit? -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
In article , Loony Tune
writes Agreed. But how about Oxford Circus, closing both Victoria and Bakerloo Lines in one hit? And Central line Only if you have to shut the whole station, which probably wouldn't be necessary. Whereas a blast in one of the four B/V platforms would effectively mean both lines had to be closed. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Strategic targets
In article ,
Colin Rosenstiel writes Agreed. But how about Oxford Circus, closing both Victoria and Bakerloo Lines in one hit? And Central line Only if you have to shut the whole station, which probably wouldn't be necessary. Whereas a blast in one of the four B/V platforms would effectively mean both lines had to be closed. So why is the Victoria Line still closed at King's Cross St Pancras? Only one exit to bring the bodies out (though I don't understand why the Thameslink exit is still shut). Oxford Circus has more than one. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |