View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 14th 17, 10:15 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
e27002 aurora[_2_] e27002 aurora[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2017
Posts: 45
Default London's Elizabeth Line's disjointed introduction

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:17:48 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote:

In message , at 08:15:01 on
Wed, 13 Dec 2017, Neil Williams remarked:

If the objective is to please people getting off the Victoria Line at
Euston, and walking to the MML platforms from there, rather than getting
off the Victoria Line at Kings Cross for the MML platforms, then I think
we can discount them as a target audience of any relevance at all.


Not everyone is arriving at St Pancras from the Victoria Line. Other
methods of transport are available. You can't please all of them; you
take from one and give to another.


The vas majority have to walk "further" to get to the MML platforms.
Victoria Line passengers are simply the ones most disadvantaged.

Only a handful of people approaching from the NNW (through a side door)
won't. If there was indeed some kind of "balancing" of need taking
place, it wouldn't be so bad. But there isn't.


TfL's facilities known as Kings Cross/St Pancras station are a
convoluted horrible mess of which TfL should be thoroughly ashamed.
Even though the station is advertised as "step free", anyone with
walking difficulties would have a hard time negotiating the distances
underground.

OTOH, above ground, the NR Kings Cross improvements, undertaken during
the period when Network Rail was private, are a magnificent blending
of old and new to create a very pleasant and functional station.

The contrast could not be more stark.