Thread: Crossrail's disjointed introduction
View Single Post
  #4   Report Post  
Old December 14th 17, 10:21 AM posted to uk.transport.london,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.railway
e27002 aurora[_2_] e27002 aurora[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2017
Posts: 45
Default London's Elizabeth Line's disjointed introduction
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:14:31 +0000 (UTC), wrote:

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:26:29 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:57:53 on Thu, 14 Dec
2017, remarked:

Anybody arriving at King's Cross St Pancras Underground station is equally
badly off, unless they arrive on the Metropolitan (etc) platforms.

Other cities do their best to make sure the interchange between lines is as
short as possible. In London we seem to deliberately do the opposite. The
new thameslink platform at St P, the jubilee line at waterloo which seems to
be
half a mile from anything else and requires a travalator are good examples.

The station at Waterloo is going to be under the Charing Cross Line
beneath Waterloo East; rather than under the old Eurostar platforms and
north end of the concourse. I don't know the specific reason for this.

As an aside - I wonder why the lines at waterloo were never linked to the
charing X line at waterloo east? They're at the same level and can't be more
than 50 metres apart at closest approach. It would have created a south river
line following the river (more or less) from richmond out to gravesend.

Strangely LT/LRT/TfL have regressed. When they built the Victoria
Line back in the 1960s they made interchange so easy. Amid Beeching,
and the general decline during that period, the Victoria Line shines
as a real achievement.
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote