View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old July 4th 19, 04:46 PM posted to
JNugent[_5_] JNugent[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2011
Posts: 338
Default Cycle lanes cutting pollution

On 04/07/2019 15:29, Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 04/07/2019 14:48, JNugent wrote:
On 04/07/2019 14:12, Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 04/07/2019 12:39, John Williamson wrote:
On 04/07/2019 10:55, Recliner wrote: 9af

I wonder how much of the pollution has been transferred to The
Highway, which is where most of the traffic from the East is
queueing up to get on to Upper Thames Street? Mind you, the parallel
Beech Street, which is a cycle route, seems to spend too much time
over the legal limit for NO2 anyway.

Rather conveniently, Tower Hamlets are not part of the monitoring
scheme the data in the article was taken from.

And no-one cares.

Congestion on the Highway causes overspill and rat running to occur
in Shadwell (Cable Street) and Wapping - North and South
respectively. This casues previously quiet streets to often become
gridlocked with very slow moving traffic who clearly has no business
in the local area.

Complaints to the local council elicited a response from a councillor
actually justifying the traffic as somewhat rightful....

...and that sounds wrong to you because those people just have no
right to travel, do they?

No - my point is that the actions of local authorities (including, in
this case, TfL and Tower Hamlets) should not turn a residential street
into a traffic congested rat run,* particularly when they decide to
bleat sanctimoniously about their efforts when it has just shifted the
problem elsewhere (and was then badly reported - CS3 has been in
existance for almost a decade, not the 3-4 years they pointed out,
although that particular extension is only that old).

What should people do when the route they actually want to follow is
deliberately congested?

Grin and bear it?

Try a different route?

Give up?