View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old May 19th 20, 03:39 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Ian Jackson[_3_] Ian Jackson[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2018
Posts: 4
Default Coronavirus: TfL reveals 20 busiest Tube and train stations 'to avoid'

In message , Roland Perry
writes
In message , at 00:01:26 on Tue, 19
May 2020, MissRiaElaine remarked:

Masks worn by the public are NOT meant to protect the wearer.


They're not PPE, and they don't perform the same function as the
gear that operating theatre staff wear to protect themselves from
infection. So your ohs's comments are irrelevant in this context.


The masks that the public may choose to wear on the bus, train,
plane or shop sole purpose is to protect *other* people from the
wearer's saliva, should they be infected. So it doesn't matter in
the slightest if they don or remove them properly, and they don't
need to wash them at 60°C. The masks don't need to fit perfectly,
just well enough to stop droplets of the wearer's saliva from being
sprayed around. Without a mask, a sneeze,loud conversation or cough
can spray droplets for several metres, and they'll linger in the
air; with a mask, even a home-made, two-layer, crude one, the
droplets won't get very far. And that's the only reason to wear one.


Just remember, when you wear a mask, you're saving other people from
contamination by *you*, not protecting yourself.


I'd still rather believe her than you.


She's got the wrong end of the stick. You should tell her they are to
protect the rest of the world from the wearer, not the other way round.
Then it becomes clear.


It's amazing how many people still don't 'get' this simple fact
(including some of the scientific 'experts' who are advising the
government).
--
Ian