http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10372932.stm

In article
,
Mizter T wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10372932.stm

yippee - that's me cleared for City Airport tomorrow morning.

E

On Jun 22, 5:51*pm, eastender wrote:

*Mizter T wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10372932.stm

yippee - that's me cleared for City Airport tomorrow morning.

I'm sure it's what you're planning on already, but perhaps best to
avoid the Jubilee line just in case things aren't well on the tubes.
Not fully step-free at Shadwell ELL, should that be an issue re
luggage (though I bet you're travelling light from LCY) - some steps
up from the platform to the 'lift hall'. The most seamless route
w.r.t. interchanges is the three legged route via Canada Water and
Canning Town, rather than the two legged route via Shadwell - though I
hardly think it's really a troublesome interchange in the grand scheme
of things. (Plus the Jubilee is of course heaving during the peaks.)

"Mizter T" wrote in message
...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10372932.stm

Further update, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/10386788.stm

Tube Lines have applied to the High Court have ballot declared illegal
because...

"...the strike ballot was inaccurate as it only employed 30 engineers but
the union said 47 staff members had voted"

Paul S

"Paul Scott" gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying:

Tube Lines have applied to the High Court have ballot declared illegal
because...

"...the strike ballot was inaccurate as it only employed 30 engineers
but the union said 47 staff members had voted"

How stupid and arrogant do these people have to be, in order to think
they'll get away with this kind of shenanigans?

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said the union would fight "the full
force of the anti-trade union laws to override a perfectly bona fide
ballot".

Oh, yes. Of course. _THAT_ stupid and arrogant.

"Adrian" wrote in message
...
"Paul Scott" gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying:

Tube Lines have applied to the High Court have ballot declared illegal
because...

"...the strike ballot was inaccurate as it only employed 30 engineers
but the union said 47 staff members had voted"

How stupid and arrogant do these people have to be, in order to think
they'll get away with this kind of shenanigans?

RMT general secretary Bob Crow said the union would fight "the full
force of the anti-trade union laws to override a perfectly bona fide
ballot".

Oh, yes. Of course. _THAT_ stupid and arrogant.

I see that Bob Crow is now calling for mass strikes in support of public
sector workers who will now become unemployed. He didn't give a toss any
time in the last three years when it was private sector workers losing their
jobs. So that wil be no support from me then.

Kevin

On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:51:10 +0100
"Zen83237" wrote:
I see that Bob Crow is now calling for mass strikes in support of public
sector workers who will now become unemployed. He didn't give a toss any
time in the last three years when it was private sector workers losing their
jobs. So that wil be no support from me then.

Mr Bob "Working class hero" Crow on 105,000 a year according to Metro today.

Still, if the stupid sheep who make up the RMT membership still believe all
that class war guff then they're even thicker than I gave them credit for.

B2003

On 2 July, 09:29, wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 21:51:10 +0100

"Zen83237" wrote:
I see that Bob Crow is now calling for mass strikes in support of public
sector workers who will now become unemployed. He didn't give a toss any
time in the last three years when it was private sector workers losing their
jobs. So that wil be no support from me then.

Mr Bob "Working class hero" Crow on 105,000 a year according to Metro today.

Still, if the stupid sheep who make up the RMT membership still believe all
that class war guff then they're even thicker than I gave them credit for.

B2003

That story said more about the Taxpayers' Alliance than about Bob
Crow. They would rather pursue their true political interests to
attack people who aren't paid through taxes.

On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:11:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIG wrote:
That story said more about the Taxpayers' Alliance than about Bob
Crow. They would rather pursue their true political interests to
attack people who aren't paid through taxes.

Actually what it says about Bob Crow is that anyone on 105K and still trying
to fight some patheric class war is nothing more than a cynical aggitator
and a stinking hypocrite.

B2003

On 3 July, 18:35, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 02:11:23 -0700 (PDT)

MIG wrote:
That story said more about the Taxpayers' Alliance than about Bob
Crow. *They would rather pursue their true political interests to
attack people who aren't paid through taxes.

Actually what it says about Bob Crow is that anyone on 105K and still trying
to fight some patheric class war is nothing more than a cynical aggitator
and a stinking hypocrite.

I am not defending large salaries for union leaders. I spent a lot of
my union activity opposing them in the past.

But for an organisation supposedly campaigning for value for taxpayers
to choose to campaign around salaries that don't come out of taxes is
even more hypocritical.