Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014\06\17 09:23, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 09:10:31 on Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Nick Maclaren remarked: Perhaps a better way of putting it would be that South Cambridgeshire would grant an implicit licence to all Cambridge taxis for that location alone, and Cambridge would grant a 'wayleave' for South Cambridgeshire taxis doing the same (if needed). I don't think the South Cambs hackneys need a wayleave, they are already permitted to drive in the City if they have picked up a fare in South Cambs. The situation at the new station is exceptional because that small patch of South Cambs [in effect just the railway sidings themselves] is entirely land-locked by the railway and the only road access is via the City. An alternative would be to locate a section of taxi rank a couple of hundred yards away from the station buildings, which is inside the City. Borough boundaries can be moved. The boundary of Enfield was moved to match the M25 in the 1990s. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Uber app is not a taximeter | London Transport | |||
TfL Taxi Consultation to "kill" Uber | London Transport | |||
Uber driver nearly kills woman twice | London Transport | |||
Worst Uber ride ever | London Transport | |||
What's it(!) with Uber? | London Transport |