London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old February 27th 04, 12:43 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default New Tax Discs

In article , Terry Harper
writes
There are 13824 three-letter groups available. 3176 (23%) contain an X
or a Z. That roughly matches my perception of their frequency; have you
done a census?

This puzzled me at first, until I realised that there is a 1 in 24 chance of
getting a "Z" in each of one of the columns, which means a 1 in 8 chance of
getting a "Z" in one of the three columns.


No, that's not how you do it. In fact, there's about a 1 in 8.34 chance
of getting a "Z" in one of the three columns, because the cases with two
or three "Z"s pull the odds down.

The way to do it is like this. In each column, there are 22 ways not to
have an X or a Z. So there are 22*22*22 (10648) plates with no X or Z.
There are 24*24*24 (13824) in total, leaving 3176 with an X or Z.

--
Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address

  #42   Report Post  
Old February 27th 04, 01:29 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default New Tax Discs

In article ,
Colin Rosenstiel writes
I did a rather larger census while cycling from Putney to Westminster this
morning. I saw 154 cars with series 3 index plates; 50 had X or Z (32.5%).


Okay, we can now do some statistical analysis. A census like this is a
binomial distribution B(C,p) where C is the number of cars (you saw 154)
and p is the probability of an X or Z.

I claim that p = 3176/13824 (this is the null hypothesis). You claim it
is larger (the alternative hypothesis).

We approximate B(C,p) by the normal distribution N(Cp, Cp(1-p)), which
is N(0.23N, 0.177N). With X hits (plates with an X or Z), let:

Z = (X - mu)/sigma = (X - 0.23N)/sqrt(0.177N)

and the significance tests say that in a random sample:

Z 1.64 5% of the time
Z 2.33 1% of the time

You had N = 154, X = 50. So Z = (50 - 35.4)/5.22 = 2.79. That's highly
significant (it happens less than 1 in 378 times). It looks like you're
right.

--
Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Road Hog Road Tax Cartoon. Clangnuts London Transport 1 March 24th 07 01:06 PM
Mayor says no tax rise for Games alex_t London Transport 30 March 19th 07 01:21 PM
'Mares promise to Tax School run Mums Yanart Amin Ari London Transport 6 May 27th 04 02:21 PM
The effects of a road congestion tax Tom Sacold London Transport 77 November 30th 03 02:51 AM
Big car owners face tax hike dave F London Transport 11 October 20th 03 12:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017