|
Front-boarding only for BBs
Passengers using London's New Routemaster buses will only be able to board
them using the front door in future, transport bosses have said. The vehicles were originally designed to allow people to enter through doors in the rear, middle or at the front. But a Transport for London (TfL) pilot on one route showed fare evasion rates were twice as high on New Routemasters compared to other buses. The change will be introduced on the first buses on 25 January. … A test carried out by TfL last year where passengers could only board New Routemasters on route 8 using the front door led to evasion rates being more than halved. As a result, the transport body estimates more than £3.6m is lost each year through people not paying fares on New Routemasters, compared to other front-boarding only buses. The pilot was also found not to affect how long it took for people to board the vehicles, as well as helping people with accessibility needs who were still able to use the middle doors while not having to compete with other passengers as previously occurred. Director of bus operations Claire Mann described fare dodging as "criminal and unfair". "Our successful pilot on the route 8 has shown that boarding using the front door only doesn't delay the service and reduces fare evasion, so we will change all other New Routemasters to follow suit," she said. From https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-51062969 |
Front-boarding only for BBs
In message , at 23:17:07 on Fri, 10 Jan
2020, Recliner remarked: Director of bus operations Claire Mann described fare dodging as "criminal and unfair". As is perhaps the foisting of the new design of bus on the public, with promises of benefits which were ultimately shown to be false, and disbenefits we weren't warned about. [Hmm... promises, sides of buses, what does that remind us of] "Our successful pilot on the route 8 has shown that boarding using the front door only reads much better with a comma here doesn't delay the service and reduces fare evasion, so we will change all other New Routemasters to follow suit," she said. -- Roland Perry |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Roland Perry wrote:
[Hmm... promises, sides of buses, what does that remind us of] https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2...-boris-johnson sounds very familiar read from today's perspective... Theo |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 11/01/2020 08:20, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 23:17:07 on Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Recliner remarked: Director of bus operations Claire Mann described fare dodging as "criminal and unfair". As is perhaps the foisting of the new design of bus on the public, with promises of benefits which were ultimately shown to be false, and disbenefits we weren't warned about. [Hmm... promises, sides of buses, what does that remind us of] "Our successful pilot on the route 8 has shown that boarding using the front door only reads much better with a comma here I see what you mean, but putting an unpaired comma between the subject and the verb is illiterate. The problem is caused by the position of the word "only", and can be solved by rewording it as "... boarding using only the front door doesn't delay ...". doesn't delay the service and reduces fare evasion, so we will change all other New Routemasters to follow suit," she said. Are they going to make the staircases one way? (Up at the front and down at the back) That would finally make a justification for having more than one staircase. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 23:17:07 on Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Recliner remarked: Director of bus operations Claire Mann described fare dodging as "criminal and unfair". As is perhaps the foisting of the new design of bus on the public, with promises of benefits which were ultimately shown to be false, and disbenefits we weren't warned about. [Hmm... promises, sides of buses, what does that remind us of] Indeed so. Incidentally, have we heard any more about Boris's claimed hobby of painting wooden 6-bottle wine boxes to look like double-decker buses? He probably gets through quite a few red wine boxes, so his fleet of painted model buses must by now be impressively large. I wonder where he garages it? Where did he keep them when he was so recently homeless, apparently living in his scruffy old car? [He must be the first PM who needed the job for its tied accommodation, the flat above the office and the country cottage.] |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Richard J. wrote:
On 11/01/2020 08:20, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 23:17:07 on Fri, 10 Jan 2020, Recliner remarked: Director of bus operations Claire Mann described fare dodging as "criminal and unfair". As is perhaps the foisting of the new design of bus on the public, with promises of benefits which were ultimately shown to be false, and disbenefits we weren't warned about. [Hmm... promises, sides of buses, what does that remind us of] "Our successful pilot on the route 8 has shown that boarding using the front door only reads much better with a comma here I see what you mean, but putting an unpaired comma between the subject and the verb is illiterate. The problem is caused by the position of the word "only", and can be solved by rewording it as "... boarding using only the front door doesn't delay ...". doesn't delay the service and reduces fare evasion, so we will change all other New Routemasters to follow suit," she said. Are they going to make the staircases one way? (Up at the front and down at the back) That would finally make a justification for having more than one staircase. No need for that. In practice, the front stairs will remain two-way, as in other deckers, and the rears will become down-only, for exiting via the rear-door. The front stairs are ideal for exiting via the middle door. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
Front-boarding only for BBs
MissRiaElaine wrote:
It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? |
Front-boarding only for BBs
"Recliner" wrote in message ... Passengers using London's New Routemaster buses will only be able to board them using the front door in future, transport bosses have said. so the conductor is going to enforce that rule, is he? tim |
Front-boarding only for BBs
"MissRiaElaine" wrote in message ... It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. so what do you do go on a round the houses trek on three busses to avoid using one? tim |
Front-boarding only for BBs
MissRiaElaine wrote:
It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. As you live in Aberdeen its hardly a statement of sacrifice , if you lived in London and really would prefer so to stand at a bus stop waiting for a vehicle that your conscience would allow you to travel on while Boris buses could have taken you earlier then apart from you who cares, London is full of strange folk and one more wouldn’t be noticed. We all have our favourite eras often driven by emotion rather than practical considerations. Although I was only small when it took place it took me a long time to like the Routemaster as they had displaced the Trolleybuses I found fascinating , to me they were just another motorbus though later I got to learn about their construction being quite advanced. We left London 6 months after the last Trolley though so it was a bit academic, ISTR the overhead was removed quite quickly which dashed my young and innocent hopes that they might change there minds. We left London a few months later so it was all academic anyway. On regular visits back they still were just a bus not that much different on the outside from the AEC Regents seen in many provincial towns, it took the introduction of the Red Arrow branded single deckers Merlins and Swifts to provide a bit of excitement. GH |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote:
MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 11/01/2020 17:10, tim... wrote:
"MissRiaElaine" wrote in message ... It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. so what do you do go on a round the houses trek on three busses to avoid using one? Either that or get the Underground. Sometimes I even walk. -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 23:17:07 -0000 (UTC), Recliner
wrote: Passengers using London's New Routemaster buses will only be able to board them using the front door in future, transport bosses have said. See also: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...outemaster-bus |
Front-boarding only for BBs
MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. GH |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 11/01/2020 19:49, Marland wrote:
MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. I'm not *that* old..! -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 11/01/2020 19:49, Marland wrote:
MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. GH It's hard, but these are the things we have to do. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 11/01/2020 19:49, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. I'm not *that* old..! Yes you are. Vickers Viscounts are absolutely from your favoured period. You seem to disapprove of anything newer. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 11/01/2020 19:49, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. I'm not *that* old..! British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80’s , if you can remember Routemasters you should remember Viscounts. Or are you younger than your writings make you appear and your stint on London Transport came at the end of the Routemasters reign and the glory days you remember are really based on the memories of older work colleagues rather than you own though you would have loved to have been there earlier. Reminds me a bit of the writings on his railway career by Adrian Vaughan who as a young person caught the end of the era of the old ways of workings with much older colleagues and then has spent a good part of the rest of his life giving the impression he was a little disappointed that things moved on before he was able to emulate them . GH |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Marland wrote:
MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 19:49, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. I'm not *that* old..! British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80’s , if you can remember Routemasters you should remember Viscounts. Or are you younger than your writings make you appear and your stint on London Transport came at the end of the Routemasters reign and the glory days you remember are really based on the memories of older work colleagues rather than you own though you would have loved to have been there earlier. Reminds me a bit of the writings on his railway career by Adrian Vaughan who as a young person caught the end of the era of the old ways of workings with much older colleagues and then has spent a good part of the rest of his life giving the impression he was a little disappointed that things moved on before he was able to emulate them . I flew to Aberdeen by BEA Viscount in 1970, which is about the date Ria wishes all technological progress had stopped, when she was 16. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:03:24 -0000 (UTC), Recliner
wrote: Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 19:49, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. I'm not *that* old..! British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80s , if you can remember Routemasters you should remember Viscounts. Or are you younger than your writings make you appear and your stint on London Transport came at the end of the Routemasters reign and the glory days you remember are really based on the memories of older work colleagues rather than you own though you would have loved to have been there earlier. Reminds me a bit of the writings on his railway career by Adrian Vaughan who as a young person caught the end of the era of the old ways of workings with much older colleagues and then has spent a good part of the rest of his life giving the impression he was a little disappointed that things moved on before he was able to emulate them . I flew to Aberdeen by BEA Viscount in 1970, which is about the date Ria wishes all technological progress had stopped, when she was 16. MY first ever flight was on a Viscount operated by Southern Air (I think as a wet-lease to DanAir) from Gatwick to Orly. This was in 1979. My first few business flights were on British Midland Viscounts from LHR to Teeside not long after that. So they certainly flew into the 1980s. My main memory of them is that the overhead luggage racks had no doors, they were just open, like on a train. ObRailway: I used Teeside Airport station for my onward journey to Redcar. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Trolleybus wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 02:03:24 -0000 (UTC), Recliner wrote: Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 19:49, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:04, Recliner wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. Presumably it's not hard to avoid them, given that you live in Aberdeen? I spend quite a lot of time in London actually, there are flights all the time :-) Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. I'm not *that* old..! British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80s , if you can remember Routemasters you should remember Viscounts. Or are you younger than your writings make you appear and your stint on London Transport came at the end of the Routemasters reign and the glory days you remember are really based on the memories of older work colleagues rather than you own though you would have loved to have been there earlier. Reminds me a bit of the writings on his railway career by Adrian Vaughan who as a young person caught the end of the era of the old ways of workings with much older colleagues and then has spent a good part of the rest of his life giving the impression he was a little disappointed that things moved on before he was able to emulate them . I flew to Aberdeen by BEA Viscount in 1970, which is about the date Ria wishes all technological progress had stopped, when she was 16. MY first ever flight was on a Viscount operated by Southern Air (I think as a wet-lease to DanAir) from Gatwick to Orly. This was in 1979. My first few business flights were on British Midland Viscounts from LHR to Teeside not long after that. So they certainly flew into the 1980s. Yes, definitely, but not between London and Aberdeen, the route Ria nw flies on a hated post-1970 mode of transport. I think it was Tridents by then. I flew that route quite a lot in those days. My main memory of them is that the overhead luggage racks had no doors, they were just open, like on a train. That was normal in that era. I think they were intended as hat racks. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 12/01/2020 01:39, Marland wrote:
British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80’s , I remember when I was working in Germany in the late 80s that the airmails were delivered on a Viscount flown by British Air Ferries. Years later I met one of the pilots who flew that 'plane, as it used to wake me up in the morning when flying over my house. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Recliner wrote:
Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: Not with Vickers Viscounts though, how do you force yourself on to something more modern. I'm not *that* old..! British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80’s , if you can remember Routemasters you should remember Viscounts. Or are you younger than your writings make you appear and your stint on I flew to Aberdeen by BEA Viscount in 1970, which is about the date Ria wishes all technological progress had stopped, when she was 16. She is younger then than I would have thought from her writings, by 1970 London Transport was already running other buses of different designs such as Daimler Fleetlines,AEC Swifts and Merlins and Leyland Nationals were only few years away . So the London Transport of the 1970’s she appears to have worked for had already lost much of its quality image with another dent soon to come when the cheap looking white roundel replaced the distinctive London Transport fleet name in Gold coloured lettering. I had thought she must have worked for them in the swinging sixties before the individuality had started to ebb away. GH |
Front-boarding only for BBs
"Sammi Gray-Jones" wrote in message ... On 12/01/2020 01:39, Marland wrote: British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80’s , I remember when I was working in Germany in the late 80s that the airmails were delivered on a Viscount flown by British Air Ferries. Years later I met one of the pilots who flew that 'plane, as it used to wake me up in the morning when flying over my house. did it fly a bit low that day then? tim |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 12/01/2020 18:35, tim... wrote:
"Sammi Gray-Jones" wrote in message ... On 12/01/2020 01:39, Marland wrote: British Airways were still operating a few Viscounts into the early 80’s , I remember when I was working in Germany in the late 80s that the airmails were delivered on a Viscount flown by British Air Ferries. Years later I met one of the pilots who flew that 'plane, as it used to wake me up in the morning when flying over my house. did it fly a bit low that day then? tim Our house was only a few hundred yards from the end of the runway, and when landing in that direction it was less than 100 feet off the deck. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 11/01/2020 17:51, Marland wrote:
MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these monstrosities, they are an insult to the traditional Routemaster that served London so well for so long. As you live in Aberdeen its hardly a statement of sacrifice , if you lived in London and really would prefer so to stand at a bus stop waiting for a vehicle that your conscience would allow you to travel on while Boris buses could have taken you earlier then apart from you who cares, London is full of strange folk and one more wouldn’t be noticed. We all have our favourite eras often driven by emotion rather than practical considerations. Although I was only small when it took place it took me a long time to like the Routemaster as they had displaced the Trolleybuses I found fascinating , to me they were just another motorbus though later I got to learn about their construction being quite advanced. We left London 6 months after the last Trolley though so it was a bit academic, ISTR the overhead was removed quite quickly which dashed my young and innocent hopes that they might change there minds. We left London a few months later so it was all academic anyway. On regular visits back they still were just a bus not that much different on the outside from the AEC Regents seen in many provincial towns, it took the introduction of the Red Arrow branded single deckers Merlins and Swifts to provide a bit of excitement. GH Ironically, long after the wires came down in Twickenham and, yes, they were taken down very quickly, the tram rails used to regularly reappear every summer when the diaphanously thin tar laid over them near Twickenham Junction used to peel off. Also the slot for the Junction point lever was still there. As a conductor at Fulwell Garage around 1970, I can state that the RMs were far more popular with my colleagues than the RT/Regents. The latter were not that well sprung by then whereas the conductor's position in the RMs were so much better ride-wise - plus that that position was recessed, so less passengers jumping onto your feet as they rushed out off the lower deck. Fulwell still had poles, cobbles and tram tracks in those days - but, just like at Twickenham Junction, the diaphanous tarmac later applied was ripped up by the SMs that took over from both RTs and RMs at that time. PA |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Peter Able wrote:
On 11/01/2020 17:51, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these We all have our favourite eras often driven by emotion rather than practical considerations. Although I was only small when it took place it took me a long time to like the Routemaster as they had displaced the Trolleybuses I found fascinating , to me they were just another motorbus though later I got to learn about their construction being quite advanced. Ironically, long after the wires came down in Twickenham and, yes, they were taken down very quickly, the tram rails used to regularly reappear every summer when the diaphanously thin tar laid over them near Twickenham Junction used to peel off. I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to Hampton Court. Normally we never went outwards that our journeys always being inwards so had not seen any remaining tram lines in the road before. Though at that time the former Tram depot in between Chiswick and Hammersmith at that time still had them visible as far as the gate. I think they were still there when the fleet assigned to BEA link bus duties were located there a bit later. As a conductor at Fulwell Garage around 1970, I can state that the RMs were far more popular with my colleagues than the RT/Regents. The latter were not that well sprung by then whereas the conductor's position in the RMs were so much better ride-wise - plus that that position was I always forget the RT was part of the AEC line, I suppose I was was mainly thinking about the later Regent Vs which to a pure layman did not look too dissimilar at first glance especially rear entrance open platform ones operated by some operators like Southampton. GH |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 15 Jan 2020 20:17:18 GMT
Marland wrote: Peter Able wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:51, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these We all have our favourite eras often driven by emotion rather than practical considerations. Although I was only small when it took place it took me a long time to like the Routemaster as they had displaced the Trolleybuses I found fascinating , to me they were just another motorbus though later I got to learn about their construction being quite advanced. Ironically, long after the wires came down in Twickenham and, yes, they were taken down very quickly, the tram rails used to regularly reappear every summer when the diaphanously thin tar laid over them near Twickenham Junction used to peel off. I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to I do sometimes wonder what - if anything - was going through the minds of the people who authorised the destruction of tram and trolleybus systems around the UK back then to replace them with diesel buses that in those days were utterly filthy with thick blue-grey and even black smoke coming out of the exhaust being the norm. I can't help thinking some brown envelopes were involved at some point. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
|
Front-boarding only for BBs
wrote:
On 15 Jan 2020 20:17:18 GMT Marland wrote: I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to I do sometimes wonder what - if anything - was going through the minds of the people who authorised the destruction of tram and trolleybus systems around the UK back then to replace them with diesel buses that in those days were utterly filthy with thick blue-grey and even black smoke coming out of the exhaust being the norm. I can't help thinking some brown envelopes were involved at some point. There were several factors that intermingled and this far away from the events the debate probably cannot fully reach a conclusion as those who took the decisions have long died,the initial moves starting in the 1930’s. Many tram systems were worn out by then and the capital cost of replacing rails was just too much, the bigger places that could afford too sometimes decided that the power distribution network still had some life so opted for trolleybuses but many smaller towns went to the Motor bus. WW2 altered things considerably, it actually prolonged the life of some tram routes that should have ceased including London the Trolleybus conversion being interrupted. By the time that was over smaller diesel engines were available that were a better proposition than the older 1930’s versions and so the programme was never restarted. Post war building and expansion of towns did not help either together with extensive road remodelling making it difficult to to accommodate trams or trolleys with their infrastructure. Another factor was the alterations to the power supply industry as councils lost control of power stations that had originated to provide power for the tramway but now they had to pay the nationalised electricity boards just like everyone else. A few places that looked like they would have kept trolleybuses came across the problem that as there were now only a handful of them the manufactures no longer made them or if they did they were going to be very expensive compared to motor bus chassis coming of production lines in quantity for here and export. A glut of serviceable vehicles went from closed systems to others which filled in some gaps but did nothing to encourage a manufacturer to stay in such a small market. It was quite hostile environment for electric traction in city streets. It would have taken something from central government to make the conditions more favourable such as cheaper electric . Brown envelopes probably were not needed, the whole nation was turning petrolhead and the Motor industry had more potential to export IC engined vehicles than electric and at the time the UK badly needed foreign earnings from manufacturing which means dirt. It is only in recent times that we have got foreign earnings from financial services etc so have the luxury of keeping our hands clean and the heavy pollution in China ,India etc. GH |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 16 Jan 2020 11:05:52 GMT
Marland wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2020 20:17:18 GMT Marland wrote: I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to I do sometimes wonder what - if anything - was going through the minds of the people who authorised the destruction of tram and trolleybus systems around the UK back then to replace them with diesel buses that in those days were utterly filthy with thick blue-grey and even black smoke coming out of the exhaust being the norm. I can't help thinking some brown envelopes were involved at some point. There were several factors that intermingled and this far away from the And they all sound plausible - but the same could equally be said about germany or eastern europe after WW2 but in general the systems there were kept and expanded. |
Front-boarding only for BBs
|
Front-boarding only for BBs
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:52:13 +0000, Bryan Morris
wrote: In message , Robin writes On 16/01/2020 11:43, wrote: On 16 Jan 2020 11:05:52 GMT Marland wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2020 20:17:18 GMT Marland wrote: I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to I do sometimes wonder what - if anything - was going through the minds of the people who authorised the destruction of tram and trolleybus systems around the UK back then to replace them with diesel buses that in those days were utterly filthy with thick blue-grey and even black smoke coming out of the exhaust being the norm. I can't help thinking some brown envelopes were involved at some point. There were several factors that intermingled and this far away from the And they all sound plausible - but the same could equally be said about germany or eastern europe after WW2 but in general the systems there were kept and expanded. Many cities in France removed their trams after WW2. Some of them have reinstated them since but it was a lot easier to do so with wide boulevards. London is mostly different. Problem with trams/trolley busses is they can't overtake each other and go at the speed of the one in front. With narrow streets they cause congestion. We used to have a trolley bus route outside our flat, there was a junction so the conductor had to get out to pull a chain switching the poles in a form of overhead points. You might be interested in how contemporary trams switch routes with points in the overhead wires: https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57657326035738 |
Front-boarding only for BBs
Recliner writes:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:52:13 +0000, Bryan Morris wrote: In message , Robin writes On 16/01/2020 11:43, wrote: On 16 Jan 2020 11:05:52 GMT Marland wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2020 20:17:18 GMT Marland wrote: I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to I do sometimes wonder what - if anything - was going through the minds of the people who authorised the destruction of tram and trolleybus systems around the UK back then to replace them with diesel buses that in those days were utterly filthy with thick blue-grey and even black smoke coming out of the exhaust being the norm. I can't help thinking some brown envelopes were involved at some point. There were several factors that intermingled and this far away from the And they all sound plausible - but the same could equally be said about germany or eastern europe after WW2 but in general the systems there were kept and expanded. Many cities in France removed their trams after WW2. Some of them have reinstated them since but it was a lot easier to do so with wide boulevards. London is mostly different. Problem with trams/trolley busses is they can't overtake each other and go at the speed of the one in front. With narrow streets they cause congestion. We used to have a trolley bus route outside our flat, there was a junction so the conductor had to get out to pull a chain switching the poles in a form of overhead points. You might be interested in how contemporary trams switch routes with points in the overhead wires: https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57657326035738 The trams seem to have the same type of pick‐up as the trolley buses. Is it possible to combine pantograph pick‐ups with trolley buses? I’m just trying to visualise it, the two cable systems would have to be at slightly different levels, I suppose. -- Ian ◎ |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:58:45 +0000
Ian Clifton wrote: Recliner writes: On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:52:13 +0000, Bryan Morris wrote: In message , Robin writes On 16/01/2020 11:43, wrote: On 16 Jan 2020 11:05:52 GMT Marland wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2020 20:17:18 GMT Marland wrote: I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to I do sometimes wonder what - if anything - was going through the minds of the people who authorised the destruction of tram and trolleybus systems around the UK back then to replace them with diesel buses that in those days were utterly filthy with thick blue-grey and even black smoke coming out of the exhaust being the norm. I can't help thinking some brown envelopes were involved at some point. There were several factors that intermingled and this far away from the And they all sound plausible - but the same could equally be said about germany or eastern europe after WW2 but in general the systems there were kept and expanded. Many cities in France removed their trams after WW2. Some of them have reinstated them since but it was a lot easier to do so with wide boulevards. London is mostly different. Problem with trams/trolley busses is they can't overtake each other and go at the speed of the one in front. With narrow streets they cause congestion. We used to have a trolley bus route outside our flat, there was a junction so the conductor had to get out to pull a chain switching the poles in a form of overhead points. You might be interested in how contemporary trams switch routes with points in the overhead wires: https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57657326035738 The trams seem to have the same type of pick‐up as the trolley buses. Is it possible to combine pantograph pick‐ups with trolley buses? I’m just trying to visualise it, the two cable systems would have to be at slightly different levels, I suppose. Seimens tried something like that a few years back but nothing seems to have come of it unfortunately. It requires electronic guidance but these days thats not a problem. I imagine it makes the overhead an order of magnitude simpler to build and maintain. https://new.siemens.com/global/en/pr.../electromobili ty/ehighway.html |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 15/01/2020 20:17, Marland wrote:
Peter Able wrote: On 11/01/2020 17:51, Marland wrote: MissRiaElaine wrote: It's all academic as far as I'm concerned. I refuse to travel on these We all have our favourite eras often driven by emotion rather than practical considerations. Although I was only small when it took place it took me a long time to like the Routemaster as they had displaced the Trolleybuses I found fascinating , to me they were just another motorbus though later I got to learn about their construction being quite advanced. Ironically, long after the wires came down in Twickenham and, yes, they were taken down very quickly, the tram rails used to regularly reappear every summer when the diaphanously thin tar laid over them near Twickenham Junction used to peel off. I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to Hampton Court. Normally we never went outwards that our journeys always being inwards so had not seen any remaining tram lines in the road before. Though at that time the former Tram depot in between Chiswick and Hammersmith at that time still had them visible as far as the gate. I think they were still there when the fleet assigned to BEA link bus duties were located there a bit later. As a conductor at Fulwell Garage around 1970, I can state that the RMs were far more popular with my colleagues than the RT/Regents. The latter were not that well sprung by then whereas the conductor's position in the RMs were so much better ride-wise - plus that that position was I always forget the RT was part of the AEC line, I suppose I was was mainly thinking about the later Regent Vs which to a pure layman did not look too dissimilar at first glance especially rear entrance open platform ones operated by some operators like Southampton. GH I don't remember a garage/depot between Chiswick and Hammersmith. Must have gone before my time. Chiswick Works had a code, CS, but only for non-passenger duties. I remember being out on a training run on an RT from CS, along with an instructor and about 20 trainee conductors. Perhaps foolishly, the driver pulled up at a stop and an old, stooped, "geezer" mounted the platform. Once firmly on-board he looked up expecting, I guess, to see 20 passengers and one conductor. The fact that it was the exact reverse of his expectations left him - well, you can imagine (if not - just how a live cod-fish looks)!! The instructor carefully shepherded him back onto the pavement. The 267 or "London" - the RM successor to the 667 was the real money-maker for FW. The run out to Hampton Court carried a lot of tourists during the summer, and one was always pestered by Americans asking "Is that Hampton Court?". Even the little Swiss-looking Thames-side boat-house was fair game to their expectations. You can imagine the raucus "Geeeeee", as we swung around the roundabout! PA |
Front-boarding only for BBs
On 16/01/2020 19:52, Bryan Morris wrote:
Problem with trams/trolley busses is they can't overtake each other and go at the speed of the one in front. With narrow streets they cause congestion. We used to have a trolley bus route outside our flat, there was a junction so the conductor had to get out to pull a chain switching the poles in a form of overhead points. Quite often then the poles became detached from the line and then they had to stop again whilst the conductor pulled a long pole from underneath the bus to fix the overhead poles to the wires again, with a build up of traffic behind. Then if the trolley bus broke down they could only travel a few yards on a battery so again great build up behind (and no room on a narrow road for other busses to pass without themselves getting detached from the wires. No trolley busses in Central London as the wires were unsightly. If roads were wider and straighter OK but London in particular was not built with trolley busses in mind. Wasn't a problem! Where routes 667 and 657(?) merged - at Busch Corner, Isleworth - the drivers used to hold back intentionally so that the other garage's trolleybus took the strain ALL the way along the Chiswick High Road! I guess that the same thing happened with trams - and the habit carried through to the age of Routemasters UNTIL - in 1971, I think - the bonus system switched from garage-based to crew-based. In an instant the drivers were suddenly Stirling Mosses when heading for Busch Corner! BTW - and this comment is only as good as 50 years memory allows - I seem to recall that the ex-trolley drivers at FW said that they switched wires by biasing the trolleys as they approached the bifurcation. PA |
Front-boarding only for BBs
In message , Recliner
writes On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:52:13 +0000, Bryan Morris wrote: In message , Robin writes On 16/01/2020 11:43, wrote: On 16 Jan 2020 11:05:52 GMT Marland wrote: wrote: On 15 Jan 2020 20:17:18 GMT Marland wrote: I wonder if it was Twickenham I saw some tram lines on my last London Trolleybus ride. My Grandad took me out for a last day of rides on the Trolleys just before they ceased and we went to the end of the route 667 from Chiswick to I do sometimes wonder what - if anything - was going through the minds of the people who authorised the destruction of tram and trolleybus systems around the UK back then to replace them with diesel buses that in those days were utterly filthy with thick blue-grey and even black smoke coming out of the exhaust being the norm. I can't help thinking some brown envelopes were involved at some point. There were several factors that intermingled and this far away from the And they all sound plausible - but the same could equally be said about germany or eastern europe after WW2 but in general the systems there were kept and expanded. Many cities in France removed their trams after WW2. Some of them have reinstated them since but it was a lot easier to do so with wide boulevards. London is mostly different. Problem with trams/trolley busses is they can't overtake each other and go at the speed of the one in front. With narrow streets they cause congestion. We used to have a trolley bus route outside our flat, there was a junction so the conductor had to get out to pull a chain switching the poles in a form of overhead points. You might be interested in how contemporary trams switch routes with points in the overhead wires: https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57657326035738 From memory the default was straight ahead, if the bus had to use the outside pair of wires the conductor got off, pulled this chain down and held it, the driver then drove the bus forward till it was on the outside pair when the conductor let go of the chain, ran after the bus and (I think) thumped the back so the driver knew he was back on board. I can't see from the photos how the points work or who (if anyone) operates them. I also recall at, I think Shoreditch, where the buses had to make a right hand turn , more often than not, the trolley poles flew off the wires. Then of course trolleybuses didn't cross the Thames. -- Bryan Morris |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk