Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Several times in the last week (about 0810), the indicator boards at
Totteridge and Whetstone have shown : 1) Morden via Bank 2) Kennington via Charing Cross 3) Morden via Bank The CX train then changes to "not in service", when this train arrives it has "not in service" displayed on the front, but already has passengers on boards, and lets on at T&W. It then changes to a labelled CX train at West Finchley, and carries through to Kennington. Has happened 3 times in the last 10 days or so at about the same time. Any ideas why ? Could it be to try to stop people boarding at T&W and WP, and let WF's passengers get a seat ? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zac wrote:
Several times in the last week (about 0810), the indicator boards at Totteridge and Whetstone have shown : 1) Morden via Bank 2) Kennington via Charing Cross 3) Morden via Bank The CX train then changes to "not in service", when this train arrives it has "not in service" displayed on the front, but already has passengers on boards, and lets on at T&W. It then changes to a labelled CX train at West Finchley, and carries through to Kennington. Has happened 3 times in the last 10 days or so at about the same time. Any ideas why ? Could it be to try to stop people boarding at T&W and WP, and let WF's passengers get a seat ? Why do you assume it's deliberate? Does it not occur to you it might simply be a fault that the technicians haven't been able to fix yet? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Several times in the last week (about 0810), the indicator boards at
Totteridge and Whetstone have shown : 1) Morden via Bank 2) Kennington via Charing Cross 3) Morden via Bank The CX train then changes to "not in service", when this train arrives it has "not in service" displayed on the front, but already has passengers on boards, and lets on at T&W. It then changes to a labelled CX train at West Finchley... Why do you assume it's deliberate? Does it not occur to you it might simply be a fault that the technicians haven't been able to fix yet? Do the train describers on the platforms and the destination sign on the train receive information from the same source, then? I would have thought they'd be independent, but I guess if the train signs are electronic, that no longer needs to be the case. -- Mark Brader, Toronto "It is almost always wrong to strive for gilt by association." --Martin Ambuhl |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Brader wrote:
Several times in the last week (about 0810), the indicator boards at Totteridge and Whetstone have shown : 1) Morden via Bank 2) Kennington via Charing Cross 3) Morden via Bank The CX train then changes to "not in service", when this train arrives it has "not in service" displayed on the front, but already has passengers on boards, and lets on at T&W. It then changes to a labelled CX train at West Finchley... Why do you assume it's deliberate? Does it not occur to you it might simply be a fault that the technicians haven't been able to fix yet? Do the train describers on the platforms and the destination sign on the train receive information from the same source, then? I would have thought they'd be independent, but I guess if the train signs are electronic, that no longer needs to be the case. No. On board destination indicators, including the in-carriage displays, and the voice announcements, are set by the driver. These are completely separate from platform indications. I have normally found the driver's knowledge to be more accurate than that displayed on platforms. I cannot understand why a passenger train would display "Not in Service" and then revert to a normal destination. Lawrence Myers -- Lawrence Myers |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brimstone" wrote in message ...
Zac wrote: Several times in the last week (about 0810), the indicator boards at Totteridge and Whetstone have shown : 1) Morden via Bank 2) Kennington via Charing Cross 3) Morden via Bank The CX train then changes to "not in service", when this train arrives it has "not in service" displayed on the front, but already has passengers on boards, and lets on at T&W. It then changes to a labelled CX train at West Finchley, and carries through to Kennington. Has happened 3 times in the last 10 days or so at about the same time. Any ideas why ? Could it be to try to stop people boarding at T&W and WP, and let WF's passengers get a seat ? Why do you assume it's deliberate? Does it not occur to you it might simply be a fault that the technicians haven't been able to fix yet? Brent Cross has been showing incorrect information for a few weeks now aswell. Kevin |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Kevin)typed
Brent Cross has been showing incorrect information for a few weeks now aswell. A FEW WEEKS? Anything north of Hampstead has shown duff information for as long as I can remember! Well, at least since 1988. That year, I travelled with my father from Golders Green[1] and he joked that the information was better 'in his day'. He is now 74 and has been using the Northern Line for a l-o-n-g time... [1] He wanted Bank trains, I wanted Charing Cross. We would take the first train and travel together. The one who *had* to change trains was not necessarily the one who thought it on boarding... -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Helen Deborah Vecht wrote in message ...
(Kevin)typed Brent Cross has been showing incorrect information for a few weeks now aswell. A FEW WEEKS? Anything north of Hampstead has shown duff information for as long as I can remember! Well, at least since 1988. Indeed. When I used to live near and commute on the northern line back in the mid 90s the only thing you could rely on with the indicators is that you couldn't rely on them! The only use they had was to inform us that yes there was a train coming at some point if we waited! ![]() B2003 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
www.runnersneed.co.uk
"Brimstone" wrote in message ... Zac wrote: Several times in the last week (about 0810), the indicator boards at Totteridge and Whetstone have shown : 1) Morden via Bank 2) Kennington via Charing Cross 3) Morden via Bank The CX train then changes to "not in service", when this train arrives it has "not in service" displayed on the front, but already has passengers on boards, and lets on at T&W. It then changes to a labelled CX train at West Finchley, and carries through to Kennington. Has happened 3 times in the last 10 days or so at about the same time. Any ideas why ? Could it be to try to stop people boarding at T&W and WP, and let WF's passengers get a seat ? Why do you assume it's deliberate? Does it not occur to you it might simply be a fault that the technicians haven't been able to fix yet? Mr Brimstone Ok, I'm very sorry, may be it is a fault which the technicians have not been able to fix. I was only offering an idea up for discussuion/thoughts for the newsgroup. It did actually occur that it may be a fault, but am I not able to offer any sort of ideas myself ? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Zac wrote:
www.runnersneed.co.uk "Brimstone" wrote in message ... Zac wrote: Several times in the last week (about 0810), the indicator boards at Totteridge and Whetstone have shown : 1) Morden via Bank 2) Kennington via Charing Cross 3) Morden via Bank The CX train then changes to "not in service", when this train arrives it has "not in service" displayed on the front, but already has passengers on boards, and lets on at T&W. It then changes to a labelled CX train at West Finchley, and carries through to Kennington. Has happened 3 times in the last 10 days or so at about the same time. Any ideas why ? Could it be to try to stop people boarding at T&W and WP, and let WF's passengers get a seat ? Why do you assume it's deliberate? Does it not occur to you it might simply be a fault that the technicians haven't been able to fix yet? Mr Brimstone Ok, I'm very sorry, may be it is a fault which the technicians have not been able to fix. I was only offering an idea up for discussuion/thoughts for the newsgroup. It did actually occur that it may be a fault, but am I not able to offer any sort of ideas myself ? The tone of your posting suggested that this was a deliberate feature, hence my question. I was merely seeking clarification, is that not allowed? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rear Route Indicator on Double Deckers | London Transport | |||
LU Estimated Time of Arrival Station Boards | London Transport | |||
More Tube lines now have live ETA boards | London Transport | |||
Chiltern & the online live departure boards | London Transport | |||
Dot Matrix replaces big boards at L/Pool St | London Transport |