| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
May 6th 09, 02:26 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
London Underground Lines - additional peak resources
Which London Underground line incurs the fewest additional resources
to cater for peak-time demand and which has the most? -- gordon |
|
#2
May 6th 09, 02:32 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
London Underground Lines - additional peak resources
On May 6, 3:26*pm, " wrote:
Which London Underground line incurs the fewest additional resources to cater for peak-time demand and which has the most? The Circle obviously uses the least, with no increase in peak frequency (and often no service anyway). |
|
#3
May 6th 09, 03:35 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
London Underground Lines - additional peak resources
On May 6, 3:32*pm, MIG wrote: On May 6, 3:26*pm, " wrote: Which London Underground line incurs the fewest additional resources to cater for peak-time demand and which has the most? The Circle obviously uses the least, with no increase in peak frequency (and often no service anyway). Ha! utl awaits, with baited breath, the success or otherwise of the Teacup! (Should there perhaps be a tea party on-board when it starts? Or might Boris come down hard on that increasingly downtrodden minority, the humble fine china saucer-holic?) |
|
#4
May 6th 09, 06:44 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
London Underground Lines - additional peak resources
On May 6, 4:35*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On May 6, 3:32*pm, MIG wrote: On May 6, 3:26*pm, " wrote: Which London Underground line incurs the fewest additional resources to cater for peak-time demand and which has the most? The Circle obviously uses the least, with no increase in peak frequency (and often no service anyway). Ha! utl awaits, with baited breath, the success or otherwise of the Teacup! (Should there perhaps be a tea party on-board when it starts? Or might Boris come down hard on that increasingly downtrodden minority, the humble fine china saucer-holic?) Off at a tangent in every sense, maybe the District line should be renamed the Saucer line? |
|
#5
May 9th 09, 01:29 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
|
London Underground Lines - additional peak resources
In message
, at 11:44:46 on Wed, 6 May 2009, MIG remarked: Ha! utl awaits, with baited breath, the success or otherwise of the Teacup! (Should there perhaps be a tea party on-board when it starts? Or might Boris come down hard on that increasingly downtrodden minority, the humble fine china saucer-holic?) Off at a tangent in every sense, maybe the District line should be renamed the Saucer line? Brussels now has a teacup line (#6): http://www.urbanrail.net/eu/bru/brussels.htm Almost all maps of the Brussels Metro available online are years out of date  -- Roland Perry |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Oyster peak/off-peak definitions | London Transport | |||
| Peak Time Access To Victoria/Piccadilly/Northern Lines At Kings Cross | London Transport | |||
| Off-Peak Return tickets Cambridge-London | London Transport | |||
| No incentive to travel off-peak on London Buses from January | London Transport | |||
| Travelcard Peak/Off Peak | London Transport | |||
Linear Mode
