Basil Jet wrote on 12 November
2009 14:40:28 ...
Bruce wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:22:38 -0000, "Basil Jet"
wrote:
Bruce wrote:
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:52:22 -0000, "Peter Andrews"
wrote:

Wow, congratulations a lot of work!

Agreed, and the idea of releasing a draft copy for comment - and
getting it very thoroughly proof checked for free in the process -
shows an awful lot of imagination.

Unless he's planning to sell it, why shouldn't he do that?

Where did I suggest that he shouldn't?

Where did I suggest that you suggested that he shouldn't?

It's implied by asking "why shouldn't he do that?". And even if he *is*
planning to sell it, what's wrong with getting it proof-checked for
free? Are you suggesting he would then be crossing some sort of ethical
boundary? Good luck to him, I say.

--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)