View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 10, 06:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london
[email protected] rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Default Unable to pick up Oyster from NR in Jan 10

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:19:56 -0600,

wrote:

Hmm. Why is the TfL Single Fare finder still showing the 2009 version,
with only a link to the next fares (2010)?

Looking there I see the off-peak Oyster fare Kings Cross St Pancras to
Putney is now £2.80, 50p more than Kings Cross St Pancras to East
Putney.


Err that's true for the peak tariff but off peak the tube journey costs
£1.80 and the tube / NR journey costs £2.80 (both on PAYG). In the peak
it is £2.30 vs £3.20. Not that that makes things much better if you want
to use NR.


Sorry, I meant that the off-peak Oyster PAYG fare is 50p more.

So much for a zonal fares system! Putney and East Putney are both in
zones 2 and 3.


Yes and the fares were always different and I suspect will always remain
so. It's interesting that everyone thought we were getting a fully
integrated system.


That is what so annoyed South Londoners in 1982 and ever since, something
zonal fares were supposed to fix.

If you want some real fun look up the cash fare for Liverpool St to
Stratford and then look up the cash fare for Liverpool Street to
Maryland. If that's not an example of the world going mad I'm not sure
what is. It's also indicative of what happens when you have the LUL
farescale for one origin / destination pair and the NR one for the
other.

And for extra fun look up Liverpool St (NR) to Stratford and Liverpool
St (LUL) to Stratford. Despite supposedly being on the LUL farescale you
will different PAYG rates - I have queried this one because it makes no
sense to me at all given that the route is interavailable.


Indeed. No doubt there are more nonsenses in this dog's dinner.

--
Colin Rosenstiel