View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 10, 10:58 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Clive D. W. Feather[_2_] Clive D. W. Feather[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 240
Default London Bridge interchange

In message , Sir Benjamin Nunn
wrote:
Does anybody know why - given that both Jubilee Line platforms were of
completely new build, and one of the Northern Line platforms was
laterally resited - the interchange was not made more convenient and
accessible.

[...]
Couldn't they have put the Jubilee at a direct right angle to the
Northern Line, at a slightly lower level and with an equally generous
'island' between the platforms, then just had a bank of escalators from
platform level to platform level?


I have an axonmetric diagram (it says) of the station. From it, it
appears that the Jubilee crosses the Northern well south of the latter's
platforms. I presume there's a good reason it was sent that way rather
than under the Northern Line - perhaps to reduce the curvature and the
length of the line, since I believe the Northern Line station is roughly
under the main line bridge across Borough High Street.

Once you accept there were good reasons for putting the line that far
south, the interchange arrangements become pretty obvious.

Similarly at Waterloo, the main purpose of the Jubilee station was to
interchange with the suburban lines, not with the other Underground
lines. Hence the station was put at the right place to have an escalator
link to the Colonnades.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Mobile: +44 7973 377646 | Web: http://www.davros.org
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: