View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 10, 10:52 AM posted to uk.transport.london
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default Oyster Extension Permits (OEPs)

On 3 Jan, 11:23, trainmanUK wrote:
....

In another thread, someone posted the result of an FOI request, which
included a TfL staff briefing, which included this statement.


"An Oyster Extension Permit is only needed when a journey is started
within the zones covered by a Travelcard at a LU/London Overground or
DLR station and involves travel by National Rail beyond its validity."


Seehttp://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/23222/response/62007/attach/4/P....


It seems bonkers to me too, but has it ever been suggested that NR
stations can issue OEPs?- Hide quoted text -


Of course as this is a tfl staff briefing document this would be
correct for all the people receiving said document. They are only
briefing their own staff not National Rail.

What they are also saying by implicaton is if your journey is ending
outside your zones but terminates at a LU/LO station then you dont
need an OEP.

I would like to know what the charge will be if you fail to get an
OEP. *Will it be a penalty fare (about £50) !!


If they try that on, cue high profile court cases, the end of Oyster
and the end of penalty fare schemes. TfL's stretching of the rules
will lift the lid on dodgy practices and end up with a backlash
abolishing some less dodgy ones along with them, a bit like MPs'
expenses.

It would be good if fare-evaders were prosecuted instead of being let
off with a PF, and honest travellers weren't fair game for extra cash
for breaking an arbitrary rule which has no other purpose than to get
extra cash out of people for breaking the rule. (TfL is becoming
worse than Ryanair on this.)