View Single Post
  #52   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 10, 08:56 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default LM penalty fares scheme: New Oyster Bizarrity

On 22 Feb, 09:36, JS wrote:
On 22 Feb, 09:28, JS wrote:





On 21 Feb, 12:01, Andy wrote:


On Feb 21, 9:16*am, JS wrote:


On 18 Feb, 20:45, Jamie *Thompson wrote:


On Feb 18, 5:59*pm, JS wrote:


On 16 Feb, 20:56, Jamie *Thompson wrote:


On Feb 16, 6:27*pm, Paul Corfield wrote:


On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:04:35 -0800 (PST), Mizter T
wrote:


On Feb 16, 10:40*am, Neil *Williams wrote:


On Feb 16, 11:34*am, MIG wrote:


It turned out that a punter who was travelling from Euston to Watford
on a zone 1 - 9 travelcard season stored onOysterwas being told that
he was technically without a valid ticket because it hadn't registered
a touch at Euston. *(He wasn't actually PFed or anything.)


If it was a 1-9 Travelcard, the PFI was right, because Watford
Junction is not in Zone 9, it's in a special non-Travelcard zone.
Thus, he'd have had to register a touch in (and possibly an OEP?) to
pay the PAYG amount that would be due on top.


Correct. Not sure whether LM would be all that fussed about OEPs,
given that they managed without them until January yet acceptedOyster
PAYG for all possible journeys from Watford Jn and points south
thereof.


I think the entire issue in this debate is about the Z1-9 Travelcard not
being valid at Watford Junction. Without an entry record on theOyster
card then the passenger will be charged a maximum fare on exit at
Watford as the system will be unable to calculate the add-on.