On May 1, 2:54*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On May 1, 2:07*pm, TimB wrote:





On May 1, 12:09*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:

Mizter T wrote:
On May 1, 11:11 am, "Paul Scott"
wrote:

wrote:

In article ,
(Paul Scott) wrote:

What does seem a major problem with NR Table 178

That isn't the only major problem with the new NRTT. Try looking at
table 25. Every train that runs non-stop between King's Cross and
Cambridge is missing. We know they're still running because they're
in FCC's own timetable booklet and the Lynn trains are in table 17.

And we already knew that because it is covered in another thread.

For reference, in the uk.r thread "Summer Timetable cuts?" (as it's
only on uk.r, I dare say that's why Colin may not have picked up on
it).

Ah yes, apologies to Colin...

But I mentioned it further up this thread!

You did indeed, but alas that did not appear in the
uk.transport.london iteration of the thread (and past experience
suggests Mr Rosenstiel primarily reads the somewhat more sedate utl,
as opposed to the rather more frenetic uk.r!)...

...compare and contrast this thread on uk.railway...http://groups.google.com/group/uk.ra...read/fba24cbaf...

...with it on uk.transport.london (to which it got crossposted to at a
later stage)...http://groups.google.com/group/uk.tr...se_frm/thread/...

All further confused by there being two very similarly named active
threads on uk.r at the mo - "Summer Timetable" (this one) and "Summer
Timetable cuts?" - thankfully the latter hasn't been x-posted to utl
(...yet!). It's all very straightforward isn't it, this usenet
business!

Good points. But indeed life is too full to cross-post, or to look for
cross-postings.
Tim