View Single Post
  #61   Report Post  
Old June 1st 10, 08:37 AM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
Chris Tolley[_2_] Chris  Tolley[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2009
Posts: 175
Default Imperial measurements was "Crossrail budget may be slashed by a third"

Mark Goodge wrote:

On Mon, 31 May 2010 17:22:55 +0100, Bill Borland put finger to keyboard and
typed:

In article
.com, bob writes


One American gallon: 3.785 litres

One Imperial gallon: 4.546 litres

The difference stems not from the difference in gallons, but from the
two different definitions of the pint. The Imperial pint is 20 Fl Oz,
while the US pint is only 16. From that basis, the quart and the
gallon are each defined in the same way with respect to their relevant
pints.

And the original reason for *that* is that the British pint was
originally the space occupied by one pound of dried peas (God knows
why) whereas the US pint was defined as the space occupied by one
pound of water, which seemed to be a more accurately reproducible
quantity.


Not peas, and it's the other way round, actually - the Imperial pint is the
more logical one. A pint has always been 1/8 of a gallon, but there were
traditionally different gallons for different substances.


.... that for the head being the smallest of them all, if ten gallon hats
are anything to go by. ;-)
--
http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p11938592.html
("Toffee apple" 31 017 at Colchester, 16 Apr 1980)