View Single Post
  #173   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 10, 10:02 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Stimpy Stimpy is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 254
Default 'Ending' "the war on the motorist"

On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:31:17 +0100, Bruce wrote
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 15:01:31 +0100, Stimpy
wrote:

Of course, there is an argument that says a properly designed car shouldn't
need 'add-on' wings/spoilers etc fixed or otherwise.



Many cars suffer from increased lift at higher speeds. The spoiler
provides increased downforce to counter this.

The Audi TT (first model) suffered a significant increase in rear lift
at higher speeds. In some markets, but not the UK, the automatic rear
spoiler was standard equipment. In the UK, which has a 70 mph limit,
it was an optional extra, presumably on the basis that it was not
actually needed at 70 mph.

There was some discussion in the motoring press about whether TTs sold
in the UK should all be so fitted, in case they were taken to (for
example) Germany and driven at much higher speeds - some stretches of
German autobahn have no speed limit for cars in good weather.

IIRC Audi UK accepted the suggestion. Subsequently all TTs sold in
the UK had the spoiler fitted as standard.


The original TT was released without any spoiler but a well-publicised spate
of accidents which were blamed on loss of rear-end grip prompted a recall for
the fitting of a small duck-tail spoiler. All subsequent Mk 1 TT's were
fitted with the spoiler from new.