View Single Post
  #180   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 10, 02:31 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Graeme[_2_] Graeme[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2009
Posts: 200
Default 'Ending' "the war on the motorist"

In message
d wrote:

On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:00:49 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote:
In article ,
d wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Jeff wrote:
It doesn't matter what harm he was doing. Potential damage is of some
concern though. Breaking the law is always a concern. It's strange
that some people think they should have the right to choose which laws
they break.

Oh give it a rest. The law is impotent if it doesn't have common
consent and the majority ignore it.


Are you going to take a similar view to bikes jumping red lights?

If not, what's the difference?


Traffic lights exist to prevent gridlock.


There's a certain amount of evidence to show that is not necessarily true.
Also traffic lights have been used to create congestion.

But that's not the problem caused by cyclists (and drivers) who jump red
lights.

--
Graeme Wall

This address not read, substitute trains for rail
Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail
Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/