View Single Post
  #253   Report Post  
Old August 5th 10, 04:15 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Charles Ellson Charles Ellson is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 724
Default 'Ending' "the war on the motorist"

On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 06:36:05 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T
wrote:


On Aug 4, 1:45*pm, Roland Perry wrote:

In message , at 23:28:45
on Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Peter Masson remarked:

(b)
as to not driving or supervising the driving of a motor vehicle while
using a hand-held mobile telephone or other hand-held interactive
communication device, or not causing or permitting the driving of a
motor vehicle by another person using such a telephone or other
device, * is guilty of an offence."


Is there a definition of 'driving' in there somewhere?


Not in there, but somewhere else.

Does sitting in the driving seat when the engine is running, even if
the vehicle is stationary, count as driving?


Absolutely.


I wonder how these interpretations pan out when the vehicle is a
motorhome?

I tried to dig up any specific definitions of "driving" but there
don't seem to be any in this respect. I think it is one of those
actions which the law requires to be decided on the facts in a
particular case or type of case where it is not blatantly obvious;
there are times when Joe Public's "driving" is not the law's "driving"
such as IIRC when someone is steering a traction engine but they are
not the person "driving" it.