View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 10, 07:54 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.telecom.mobile
Rupert Moss-Eccardt Rupert Moss-Eccardt is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Default I'm in the tunnel

Steve Terry wrote:
"tony wrote in message
...
In , Steve Terry
scribeth thus
"Roy wrote in message
...
On 22 Sep, 11:55, wrote:
"Roy wrote in message



On 22/09/10 11:24, Recliner wrote:
snip
Have they got the emergency services' Tetra radios working in the Tube
yet? This was one of the recommendations post 7/7. Presumably it'd
be relatively easy to piggy-back civilian mobile traffic onto that
infrastructure if it has actually been completed.
Roy

If the emergency services had adopted GSM Pro instead of Tetra,
they could have added leaky feeder down the tube for all to use
at least 10 years ago.
Steve Terry


ISTR we had this argument somewhile ago and did we came to any
conclusion why it wasn't done?..

I mean sound engineering reasons?..
Tony Sayer


Tetra has nothing to do with sound engineering reasons, it's entirely
political and a means of funnelling large quantities of taxpayers
money to O2 Airwave.


Some fairly bald assertions, there. And wrong, too.

Firstly, perhaps you can point us at a capabilities specification for
GSM Pro and take us through how it meets the requirements that Tetra
meets to match the ERC specification.

Secondly, the TfL Tetra rollout doesn't involved Airwave, other than
requiring interworking.