View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old October 24th 10, 07:21 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Dr J R Stockton[_21_] Dr J R Stockton[_21_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2010
Posts: 1
Default More Oyster Woes ...

In uk.transport.london message 39bb4a9f-1c49-4a8b-acbf-75f9835d6af9@j25
g2000yqa.googlegroups.com, Sat, 23 Oct 2010 07:28:23, MIG
posted:

Another bunch of rather less intelligent people insist that there was
a year zero, because "zero is a positive integer". Zero might
represent a point in time when zero years have passed. A year later,
one year has passed. This would be the first year, and in any normal
counting system it would be referred to as year one, ie the number of
years that have passed when it is complete.



In IEEE-754 floating-point "single" and "Double" number formats. there
is both a +zero and a -zero. They have the same value and compare
equal, but they are distinguishable, even in languages that do not offer
access to the bit patterns as such.

Astronomer's notation calls 1 BC the year zero; it numbers years in the
usual arithmetic fashion, and agrees with the common notation for all of
AD.

--
(c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05.
Website http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
PAS EXE etc. : http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/ - see in 00index.htm
Dates - miscdate.htm estrdate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.