In message , bod
writes
On 12/11/2010 12:40, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:50:14 on Fri, 12
Nov 2010, Ret. remarked:

For Boltar to pontificate based upon his assessment of an accident
scene having just driven past it long after it occurred is stupid.

But I still have this uneasy question... if it was that long after the
accident, why were almost all the lanes still closed?

Note, this is a quite different question to "why did they need to close
lanes immediately after the accident".



Was there any hazardous/dangerous cargo inside the lorry! How would
one know?

Don't vehicles carrying hazardous materials have warning markings?
--
Ian