View Single Post
  #25   Report Post  
Old December 31st 10, 03:14 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
Stimpy Stimpy is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 254
Default Crossrail western termunus

On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:37:05 +0000, Charles Ellson wrote
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 19:59:30 +0000, Philip wrote:

On 30/12/2010 15:03, Martin Edwards wrote:

And how do you think the Bristol and Norwich passengers will feel
about travelling in rapid transit trains with no bathrooms, many
draughty doors, and limited seating?

The service will require proper inter-city stock with loos (NOT
bathrooms PLEASE), doors that close properly and adequate seating.

The substandard stock which you describe will be used on services such
as Maidenhead - Shenfield.

I take it you mean lavatories.


To call a spade a spade: Toilets.

Is that anything like a tiolet ?


Hopefully not, no. One would expect a toilet to be less smelly than a
tiolet, as well as having a comprehensible locking mechanism and not being
out of order.