View Single Post
  #71   Report Post  
Old January 9th 11, 01:14 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
Graham Harrison[_2_] Graham Harrison[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2008
Posts: 278
Default Crossrail western termunus


"Paul Scott" wrote in message
...


"1506" wrote in message
...

There's no
fundamental reason why it would be any less reliable than Crossrail's
currently planned GWML services to Maidenhead, which will also run on a
mixed traffic railway, including freight, and other services running to
Reading and beyond.

Your comments suggest you haven't really got much of a clue about how
Crossrail will work on the GW reliefs.

Does anybody? Feel free to cite a working timetable post Crossrail
and WR electrification.


I can link to the currently proposed Network Rail track access option for
the Crossrail to Maidenhead situation, without GW electrification. There
are three 24 hr schedules in the document, for Crossrail, residual GW and
GE
passenger services, and for freight:

http://tinyurl.com/38s2j9q

Clearly if Crossrail gets extended to Reading, some of the DMU services
will
disappear, but the freight will still be there.

Paul




That's very interesting, thank you.

As an aside I find it intriguing that the first item in schedule 2 is for a
class 180 and that is the only reference to a 180 that I can find.