On 28 Feb 2011 17:01:02 GMT
Adrian wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

Proof is never absolute.

Total BS.

Being able to discuss, isn't one of your strong points. Note, not a
question.

What should I discuss it? "Proof is never absolute" was such a ludicrous
statement that it wasn't worth wasting time.

OK, great.

So give us an example of _absolute_ proof. Not just "beyond reasonable
doubt", but _absolute_.

Criminal videoed on CCTV committing crime with good view of face along with
corroborating witnesses. For example. Unless you subscribe to the evil twin
argument.

There can _always_ be doubt injected into things. It might not be
_reasonable_ to do so. But it can. Look at the various historical
revisionists/conspiracy-theorists - the moon landings, the holocaust,
9/11.

Anyone who claims thing like the moon landings or the holocaust didn't happen
despite concrete proof to the contrary are just so deluded and/or retarded
that their opinions are essentially irrelevant.

B2003