View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old July 16th 03, 03:18 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Jonathan Marten - Volume Systems Products UK Jonathan Marten - Volume Systems Products UK is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 5
Default the quest for safety

"Richard" writes:
When I did my driving test, and subsequent ADT, the vehicle driver was
responsible for bringing his vehicle to a stop without causing injury
regardless of whether a pedestrian steps out, runs out or falls from a
bridge above.


This strains credibility. Please give us the details of the driving
test and advanced course that you did, the type of vehicle that you
used and the name of your instructor. Because it seems that in
combination they enabled you to subvert the laws of physics - being
able to ensure that you could stop your vehicle without hitting a
pedestrian even if they were to appear immediately in front if you
with no warning, allowing zero stopping distance.

Having made an impossible claim in the first paragraph of your post,
surely nobody could be expected take the remainder of what you say
seriously.

--
Jonathan Marten, SCM Team Engineer VSP Bracknell, UK
Sun Microsystems

"Progress is not expedited by frequent requests for progress reports"