On 2 Mar 2011 15:06:04 GMT
Adrian wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

But for most normal people the evidence against Hitler
would be absolutely rock solid.

That's kinda the problem with your whole line of logic, though.

You want to raise the bar PAST "Beyond _Reasonable_ Doubt". That can ONLY
introduce UNREASONABLE doubt as a block to prosecution.

"beyond reasonable doubt" is just vacuous legalese that doesn't actually
mean anything.

If there is solid incontravertable proof of guilt then thats all thats needed.
And I've already said what that is so don't ask again.

Or just do it the american way - bang them up for 20 years or however long it
is and if no opposing evidence comes along in that time then its off
down to the chair.

B2003