On 2 Mar 2011 15:53:06 GMT
Adrian wrote:
Don't be daft, man. It's plain bloody English.

Its also meaningless because theres no such thing as "unreasonable
doubt". If anyone has a doubt then to them its not unreasonable.

So the 9/11 "truthers" and holocaust deniers are merely exercising
reasonable doubt?

From their point of view perhaps, not from anyone elses.

Beyond reasonable doubt simply means no doubt at all.

So how come you're arguing in favour of a stronger test?

*sigh*. Logically thats what "beyond reasonable doubt" means but what the
court means is "only a tiny amount of doubt".

B2003