On 2 Mar 2011 16:02:40 GMT
Adrian wrote:
gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

Don't be daft, man. It's plain bloody English.

Its also meaningless because theres no such thing as "unreasonable
doubt". If anyone has a doubt then to them its not unreasonable.

So the 9/11 "truthers" and holocaust deniers are merely exercising
reasonable doubt?

From their point of view perhaps, not from anyone elses.

So they would, or wouldn't fail "beyond reasonable doubt"?

I've explained everything well enough for anyone with a working brain to
understand. I'm not getting into yet another some pointless circular argument
with you.

B2003