View Single Post
  #16   Report Post  
Old April 21st 11, 10:03 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
Peter Fox[_4_] Peter Fox[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2010
Posts: 3
Default What does it take to be a Transport Correspondent?

Mark Robinson wrote:
On 21/04/2011 09:33, Graeme Wall wrote:

Pedantically they have motors, not engines. The latter being those nasty
infernal combustion thingies. Motors run on nice clean electrickery.


Doubly pedantically, a motor *is* an engine (an engine isn't always
a motor, though, cf siege engine, difference engine, database engine...)

No.
The use of "engine" for electric motor is unheard of.
Technically it may be called a "machine".

Calling a motor an engine is as daft as calling a cl. 45 Peak a
hexadecimalcycle.


--
Peter 'Prof' Fox
Multitude of things for beer, cycling and curiosities at
www.vulpeculox.net