View Single Post
  #46   Report Post  
Old February 9th 04, 06:36 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
Graeme Wall Graeme Wall is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,715
Default Fatality at Balham?

In message
David Hansen wrote:

On 9 Feb 2004 01:54:48 -0800 someone who may be
(Ian Johnston) wrote this:-

[snip]
Bear in mind as well that roads are hard to damage and can quickly be
patched up if they are damaged. Neither is true of railway lines,


Debatable.


Debatable?


particularly where pointwork


Hence the substitution of plain line. However, if components are
available, such as suitable switches, then it does not take that
long to install switch and crossing work.


That's a bloody big if. I've not noticed spare turnouts lying about the
network just in case.


or overhead are concerened.


Overhead is quick and easy to install, even if masts have been
destroyed. One may need a speed restriction for a few days until a
proper repair is made, but that is a process that is easy enough to
manage.



So you admit the delays of days are not that unreasonable?

--
Graeme Wall
This address is not read, substitute trains for rail.
Transport Miscellany at http://www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail/index.html