On Aug 30, 12:51*pm, Nick wrote:
On Aug 30, 11:37*am, 1506 wrote:





On Aug 29, 8:22*pm, "Railsigns.co.uk" wrote:

On Aug 29, 8:09*pm, wrote:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:32:15 -0700 (PDT)

Tom wrote:
limits. *There's a graph around the net of the Tory share of the vote
since the war and it's clearly declining, which possible explains why

Really? Hmm, thats odd:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/special/el...ml/england.stm

Looks pretty blue to me in england. (sic)

That's because the Tories tend to do well in the affluent countryside
constituencies that cover the largest geographical areas. Even in the
event of a Labour landslide, those maps would still look pretty blue.

The countryside: That would be farms. *Farmers are the folks who work
long hours to put food on your table. *They are common sense people.
They vote Conservative because they have worked very hard for what
they have. *Do you have a problem with that?

The Conservatives are currently putting hard-working people out of
work just so that their friends don't have to pay more taxes. I
certainly have a problem with that. If people want to support the
Conservatives low-tax, low-spending attitudes, fine, but don't expect
any sympathy from the state if they fall on hard times. And I'm afraid
that I find Conservative attitudes completely incompatible with my
understanding of Christianity.

No poor man ever gave me a job. Taxing the job creators will not help
turn the western economies around.

Perhaps you could explain your understanding of Christianity, and how
the UK Labour party have promulgated its values and enabled its
progress.