"Heathrow and Gatwick airports: Ministers mull rail link" (twixt
On Oct 13, 8:36*am, 77002 wrote:
On Oct 12, 6:17*pm, Neil Williams wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:29*pm, 77002 wrote:
You usually talk sense. *However, I am with Tony Polson on this one..
Green is the new Red. *I do want to breathe cleaner air in our
cities. *That can be achieved with electric transit. *But, the whole
"Hockey Stick" theory is based on false data. *Climategate brought
that out into the open. *Just look into who supports "climate change",
the "liberal" elite and their useful idiots.
Regardless of that, the case for electric powered vehicles is more
around avoiding pollution at the point of use than avoiding pollution
altogether, unless like say France you mainly get your power from
nuclear.
The point of use is in the congested cities.
In the railway's case it's about what might be providing power well
into the future, though, given the long lead times for such thing, and
about cost saving overall and reliability to some extent.
Time to look at Pebble Bed reactors and Borium. *The science has moved
on since the first generation of reactors.
My mistake "borium" should read "thorium". Bit early in the day for
this stuff.
|