View Single Post
  #14   Report Post  
Old October 30th 11, 05:29 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.transport
Mortimer Mortimer is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2005
Posts: 58
Default New signage paradigm

"Bruce" wrote in message
...
Basil Jet wrote:
On 2011\10\30 16:21, Nick Finnigan wrote:
On 30/10/2011 08:03, Basil Jet wrote:
At the crossroads of Exhibition Road and Cromwell Road SW7, traffic
approaching from three directions is now banned from turning left or
right.
This is signified by the green light being a forward arrow. At other
junctions where both turns are banned you would see a vertical white
arrow
on a blue background beneath the three traffic lights, but they have
not
done that here.

I would expect to see 'no left turn' and 'no right turn' signs in red
circles alongside or under the green arrow.


After a little googling, it seems that is the norm for forced forward
across a two way road (except Oxford Street, curiously), whereas the
blue arrow is the norm for forced forward because both side roads are no
entry. Perhaps the distinction is to help police cars etc. know that
it's okay to ignore the former but you have to be bloody careful when
ignoring the latter. I've always thought that there should be some
distinction between banned turn because of no entry and banned turn
because it's a banned turn, to help police cars driving at speed.



I wonder if the problem is that the necessary Traffic Orders were not
applied for in time? Traffic engineers would then be left to install
the lights with green arrows and hope that people obeyed them while
the Traffic Orders were obtained and the mandatory white-on-blue
'ahead only' arrows eventually added to the junction.


Surely lack of Traffic Order means that the restriction cannot be applied
until the TO is in effect. Incorrect or inadequate sign-posting means that
the order is not legally enforceable. And I'd expect the signs at *all*
banned turns to be consistent, and not to conform to different standards
based on what, for most drivers, is a technicality. There is no harm in
telling people essentially the same thing in more than one way (green arrow
and no turn left/right signs) - there are no prizes for being minimalist and
reducing the level of signage. If "redundant" signs reduce accidents and
maybe even save lives, they are a good thing.