On Jan 2, 8:18*pm, Bruce wrote:
furnessvale wrote:
Still unable to read.

Yes, I have noted that reading comprehension isn't your strong point.
*Have you considered adult literacy classes.

(Probably won't understand any of that.)

Your wit is astounding!

Where have I stated a desire to operate
"outside the system"? *My definition of a villain is, for example, a
known active burglar

The use of the word "villain" speaks volumes. *The person is either a
convicted criminal, or isn't. *But a sub-sector of the police who
have no respect for the law, and are prepared to operate outside it,
think they can replace the judge and jury, or three magistrates, and
just call people "villains" whenever they feel like it.

The fact that so many police see absolutely nothing wrong in this
demonstrates just how morally bankrupt some police forces are.

who I have stopped for a motoring offence. *Sad
to advise you that he will not be getting the on the spot caution a
little old lady may receive for the same offence, vindictive *******
aren't I.

A vindictive ******* and proud of it.

You got it in one. You are not as thick as you try to make out are
you.

Yawn. *Wonder why you chose to keep flying that Whitehall desk all
those years?

How many years would that be? *Do tell, because I have forgotten.

Dementia must be setting in.

Getting bored now. When your level of debate sinks to taking umbrage
with my use of the word villain, rather than "convicted burglar with
25 previous convictions and currently on bail for 6 more offences", it
is time to say goodbye (once again).

George