New Tax Discs
Greg Hennessy wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 01:40:41 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote:
"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message
...
In 7-8 characters, they could have easily encoded registration
information using Base36 and not have of the 4/7ths redundancy on
each and every plate.
What's your problem with the redundancy?
Its a horse designed by a committee.
That's not an answer to my question.
Isn't some of it needed anyway
to enable the old numbering systems to coexist with the new one?
Taking up nearly 60% of each and every plate issued is bad design
IMHO.
You're implying that it needs only 3 characters to identify the vehicle.
That's a maximum of 46,656 using all letters and digits. I think we
have rather more vehicles than that on the roads.
Some is needed if one is going to encode the year and location of
registration.
Personally I consider the issue of yearly plates to be silly.
Giving each license holder his own plate for life would have solved
the problem once and for all.
What is this "problem" that you are so concerned about?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)
|