View Single Post
  #57   Report Post  
Old January 21st 12, 05:35 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.rail.americas
Adam H. Kerman Adam H. Kerman is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Default London Congestion Zone charge

Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 21-Jan-12 00:13, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:
at 21:08:37 on Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Adam H. Kerman remarked:


Off-hand I can only think of three toll routes in the UK, plus the
London Congestion Zone (which I think doesn't have a transponder).


I realise toll routes are much more common in the USA.


I didn't realize there were no transponders. It's enforced entirely
with photographs of license plates?


Even toll roads in the USA are enforced by photographs of licence plates


No one enforces toll collection with photographs of license plates as
the primary system of enforcement. It supplements transponders.


That depends on what you mean by "primary". CTRMA (Austin, TX) and NTTA
(Dallas/Ft Worth, TX) give discounts for using a transponder, but those
without are simply billed by mail at the cash rate. As long as the bill
is paid on time, there are no fines.


**** off Bill Clinton

(I don't think cars without transponders are impaled on spikes).


Hah! I like spikes to protect grade crossings.


So an errant driver would be brought to a halt on top of the tracks,
directly in the path of an approaching train, rather than (as most do
today) make it across safely?


Yes. I've explained my position many, many, many times on Usenet.
Errant motorists take needless risks with their own lives and the lives
of others because they don't believe they'll be injured or killed.
I want grade-crossing protection that increases the risk of death or
serious injury to the driver for gross violation as an example to all
the other idiots.