View Single Post
  #593   Report Post  
Old February 27th 12, 01:19 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.rail.americas
Adam H. Kerman Adam H. Kerman is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Default cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)

Roland Perry wrote:
at 17:39:57 on Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Stephen Sprunk remarked:


If the charge isn't paid, the merchant isn't paid.


Wrong. If the charge is accepted by the issuing bank, the merchant gets
paid by their processor, period.


What if there's a later chargeback?


Chargebacks are debited from the merchant's account with the card
processor. If the merchant's account is closed with a negative balance
(eg. due to excessive chargebacks), the debt is collected through the
usual channels.


Note that failure of the consumer to pay their credit card bill does
_not_ result in a chargeback, contrary to Adam's ridiculous claims.


Indeed, as long as the failure to pay was "because I have no money",
rather than "because I dispute the charge".


As long as the charge was authorized by the clearinghouse!

This is the bit Stephen Sprunk is pretending to misunderstand to continue
arguing.