View Single Post
  #687   Report Post  
Old March 1st 12, 07:59 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.rail.americas
Adam H. Kerman Adam H. Kerman is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Default cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)

Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 01-Mar-12 08:40, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:


I've seen them used on trains (in the buffet car mainly), but more
common is an integrated ticket and payment machine. Traditionally
the railway did not pre-authorise at all (at their risk) but with
on-train Wi-Fi and mobile phone based devices this is likely to
change.


That's very interesting. However, couldn't these devices be loaded with
lists of invalid and canceled credit card numbers?


Before the advent of telephone authorization, credit card companies
would send merchants small books each month listing all of the invalid
and/or canceled cards that had not yet expired.


I recall using these books, yes.

Also note that many consumers today have _valid_ cards with little/no
available credit, so it's not sufficient anyway if a merchant wants to
ensure their transaction will be accepted.


No one would care on suburban/commuter railway, since the discussion
drifted back on topic, where the only concern is if fare collection in
aggregate is improved and cost of fare collection is lowered.

In intercity train travel, well, you assume that the traveler has
available credit, as it's difficult to travel without credit cards.