View Single Post
  #13   Report Post  
Old March 16th 12, 04:51 PM posted to uk.rec.driving,uk.transport.london
Bill Bill is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Default Bloody traffic police at accidents

In message , d
writes
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:52:47 +0000
Bill wrote:
Looking at it from a different angle. Your loved one is killed in a
crash and when it comes to coroners court the police say, we are not
sure what the exact reasons were, we have a few photos but no detailed


The reasons would be a traffic accident. Accidents happen. End of.


Not always.



measurements and samples because we pushed everything out of the way and


What samples? DNA on the road surface? FFS , when vehicles crash its not
rocket science to figure out what happened.


I am glad that you are such an expert, rocket science may well be
simpler.


Or you have a crash and kill someone, you are prosecuted for causing
death by, you of course say you did not and that this that and the other
happened. But again the police only have a few photos and conflicting
witness statements, no hard facts. So you end up in jail.


Well with few photos and conflicting evidence there would be no presecution
so I wouldn't be worried.


You would be if a couple of people claimed that they saw you speeding
and driving erratically before the incident and you knew full well that
you were within the speed limit. I'm sure that you would be pleading
for the scientific evidence then to prove your claim.




--
Bill