On Mar 18, 12:44*pm, 77002 wrote:


Partially by planning to build trains that have few seats and no toilets.

This is the cost of involving TfL I suppose. *Why cannot Crossrail be
run in a similar manner to Thameslink?


I suggest if through route Thameslink did not already exist and/or the
present trains on the route did not already exist, then it would be
more Crossrail like; indeed, I suggest it would also be a more metro
less main line operation, with slow all stations trains to SR ML and
GN suburban destinations, without old NSE type network express
workings.

Indeed, if I planned TL from scratch, I'd never have linked it in with
GN, but with the Met (and electrified GC suburban) at West Hampstead.
Instead we have a supermarket where we should have junctions
infrastructure, and three disjointed stations instead of one.

--
Nick