Crossrail tunnelling to start shortly
On Mar 18, 8:23*pm, Basil Jet wrote:
On 2012\03\18 16:34, 77002 wrote:
On Mar 18, 3:01 pm, *wrote:
On Mar 18, 12:44 pm, *wrote:
Partially by planning to build trains that have few seats and no toilets.
This is the cost of involving TfL I suppose. *Why cannot Crossrail be
run in a similar manner to Thameslink?
I suggest if through route Thameslink did not already exist and/or the
present trains on the route did not already exist, then it would be
more Crossrail like; indeed, I suggest it would also be a more metro
less main line operation, with slow all stations trains to SR ML and
GN suburban destinations, without *old NSE *type network express
workings.
Indeed, if I planned TL from scratch, I'd never have linked it in with
GN, but with the Met (and electrified GC suburban) at West Hampstead.
Instead we have a supermarket where we should have junctions
infrastructure, and three disjointed stations instead of one.
Cricklewood and a new junction at Neasden would have been my preferred
means of taking Thameslink onto the Met.& *Chiltern.
The new bridge carrying Neasden Lane would be visible from Crystal Palace!
The curve towards Harrow would be West of the Railway Bridge, no?
|