Thread: CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
View Single Post
  #902   Report Post  
Old March 20th 12, 05:10 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london,misc.transport.rail.americas
R J Cardy[_2_] R J Cardy[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2012
Posts: 8
Default card numbers, was cards, was E-ZPass, was CharlieCards v.v. Oyster (and Octopus?)
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ...

Because I'm not convinced that accepting a debit card which passes the C&P
PIN, but is later declined because of lack of funds, is at the retailer's
risk.
--
Roland Perry

If the retailer has followed the correct procedures they will get paid, bank
foots the bill

Richard


Reply With QuoteReply With Quote