Labour backs plans to return railway network to public control - Guardian/Observer
On Jul 4, 7:55*pm, Eric wrote:
On 2012-07-04, e27002 wrote:
If you have any knowledge of the English language, you will know that
cannot be a marriage. *A circle can never be a square.
So if I disagree with you, I must therefore have no knowledge of the
English language (which was not the subject of discussion). So not an
honest or a defensible argument then, are you happy to use it?
And no, a circle is not a square, but both are geometric figures formed
by enclosing part of the plane with an unbroken line. Both are shapes
that might be used in, say, the design of a steam locomotive.
Dictionary definitions are not a valid basis for arguing about concepts.
And we do not really want to know about your world view, beliefs, and
opinions, much less have you expect that we should agree with them.
Sentiment mutual. Take your left field mishigas elsewhere.
|