Thread: Why did the Metropolitan Railway go to Verney Junction?
View Single Post
  #11   Report Post  
Old August 30th 12, 04:55 PM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
News News is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2012
Posts: 41
Default Why did the Metropolitan Railway go to Verney Junction?
d wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:56:50 +0100
"News" wrote:
d wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:29:10 +0100
"News" wrote:
Urban, villages, towns, cities. Kate Barker report. This may help
you: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/watercity/LandArticle.html
The Supporting Links are excellent.

# Settled land - 1.8m hectares. 7.65% of the land mass.
# Agricultural land - 10.8m hectares. 45.96% of the land mass.
# Semi-natural land, with much uses as agricultural land - 7.0m
hectares. 29.78 % of the land mass.
# Woodland - 2.8m hectares. 11.91% of the land mass
# Water bodies - 0.3m hectares. 1.28% of the land mass.
# Sundry, largely transport infrastructure - 0.8m hectares. 3.42%
of the land m ass.

I'd count agricultural as settled

I fallow field has people on it? Boy you are slow.

If people own the land

snip total senile drivel
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote