View Single Post
  #35   Report Post  
Old October 27th 12, 11:15 AM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
e27002 e27002 is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2012
Posts: 150
Default Amersham and Chesham

On 27 Oct, 11:40, wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2012 6:29:11 PM UTC+1, D7666 wrote:
On the subject of 25 kV Met, Marylebone etc etc, I am still of the


view that a better Thameslink upgrade would not have been to link the


ex Midland lines to GN as KX/SP but to have linked the Midland to the


Met/GC at West Hampstead, with trains being able to both switch


between both routes. This could have been done using the sites to the


south of the present West Hampstead stations, and incorporated the NLL


station at a higher level.


This could have allowed the ML to retain its Moorgate link (but some


trains switching to the MET), allowed relief of Baker Street junction


(by having some MET trains switch to TL), and give and electrified


Chilterns route access to TL (solving the longer/more trains at


Marylebone issue).


It would also give a better spread of trains through the TL core - one


of the issues is GN realistically can't take more than 8 TPH off TL


but 24 TPH means 16 TPH have to head for the Midland which is not so


sensible. If those were (say) inner suburbans from (one time)


Wimbledon loop or other southern metro line those logically go to


Watford Met or Uxbridge, while some of the faster TL core trains can


go to [say] Aylesbury as well as Bedford.


Before some nitwit comments, it assumed that all surface lines and


Chilterns works will be to 12cars or 8car SDO where uneconomic - don't


say it is *impossible - uk.railways said 4car NLL and 12car TL was


impossible but now are reality.


If this had been done with the TL works, you'd now have a 25 kV wired


Chilterns, and linking with other matters taking AC that way towards


Banbury (for Birmingham) would result in considerable synergy and


economy of scale with the current electric Spine project.


GN capacity in my view should be dealt with by new construction from


around Finsbury Park - thats where *Crossrail 2 should *go on the


north side.


--


Nick


Spot on.


Agreed, way to go! Although rather than taking Crossrail 2 to
Finsbury Park, I would prefer to see the Northern City extended
southwards.