View Single Post
  #19   Report Post  
Old January 1st 13, 09:31 AM posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
e27002 e27002 is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2012
Posts: 150
Default London Met line signalling

On 31 Dec 2012, 20:20, Andy wrote:
On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:00:22 PM UTC, wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 04:28:48 -0800 (PST)


77002 wrote:


On 31 Dec, 11:05, wrote:


In this months Modern Railways it says the Met is going to get Citiflo 650


moving block signalling in the next few years which does away with lineside


signals. Which raises a couple of questions - why didn't they just use the


same system as on the jubilee line given that the 2 lines run side by side


for a long distance, and what will happen on the uxbridge branch which is


shared with the piccadilly? Will the latter be terminated at Rayners Lane?


My Modern Railways is still awaited. *This also raises the question of


the section, north of Harrow-on-the-Hill, utilized by Chiltern. *One


more reason to withdraw to Moor Park I guess.


The article says the S stock will be fitted with the ATP system used by


Chiltern.


No it doesn't, it says that the CityFlo infrastructure will also talk to the
Selcab ATP system fitted to Chiltern units and that line side signals will be
retained for the section from Harrow to Amersham. Both systems will be operable.

The S stock will only be fitted with the new CityFlo hardware.- Hide quoted text -

So TfL are continuing to install non-standard equipment. This is to
be expected I suppose.

Despite a strong dislike the UK's involvement with the EU; standards
are never a bad thing.