View Single Post
  #99   Report Post  
Old July 31st 13, 10:53 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Adrian Adrian is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 947
Default NB4L production buses

On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 10:03:13 +0000, spud-u-dont-like wrote:

All I'm saying is, if bikes were taxed, you would lose the ability to
demand they go away from you.


And all I'm saying is that if they want to complain about the roads
and other drivers they should pay for the priviledge.


Once again - do you apply that to the drivers of older cars,
low-emission cars and to disabled drivers? After all - none of them pay
VED, either.


I think I've already answered that when you asked if they should be made
an exception to VED, the answer being no.


Actually, I asked if they were an exception to your argument about paying
VED enhancing priority.

B'sides, they aren't an exception to VED, since all still need to possess
and display a valid disc, with MOT (where applicable) and insurance
needed in order to obtain one. It's just that the cost for that disc
happens to be zero.